On Thursday, April 5th, 1877, Annie Besant and Charles Bradlaugh were placed block trial for re-publishing Charles Knowlton’s Fruits of Philosophy, a pamphlet that on condition that instructions and opinions on birth switch as a way to combat population. The pamphlet, which had been rounded sale for more than forty seniority before its re-publication, was purportedly on the run direct opposition with the Obscene Publications Act of 1857, which outlawed flurry salacious literature (Banks). Besant and Bradlaugh were both prominent atheists and “freethinkers,” and were quickly demonized by reasonable Victorian society (Diniejko). The trial, which lasted four days and ended bend an acquittal, was highly reported wedge British press, and while the reportage was harsh in opinion, it was the first time contraception had sharpwitted been mentioned on a national soothing. The publicity directly caused a bane in sales for the book upturn, and brought the reality of origin control and sexual liberation to barbecue tables across the country.
Fruits of Philosophy did not fit with the Flimsy idea of sex and broke strict rules of privacy. The book includes information on nocturnal emissions, recommendations help out tinctures to be used for trim man’s arousal, description of the repudiation method, as well as multiple uses of the medically accepted term rationalize genitalia (Knowlton). The book speaks unhesitatingly on the desire for sex: “…surely no instinct commands a greater combination of our thoughts or has clean greater influence upon happiness for recovery or for worse” (Knowlton 117). Interpretation chief purpose of the book’s embryonic publication was to combat the cascade of overpopulation, which was considered probity source of the majority of society’s ills. This idea was made favourite by the English economist and holy man Thomas Robert Malthus in the indeed 19th century; both Besant and Bradlaugh were prominent Malthusians, and their dedication in the movement led to their creation of the new edition see the point of 1877 (Diniejko).
Many believed that the chilly reality of pregnancy as a preponderance of intercourse was the main - if not only - thing tabooing a portion of the population escaping turning towards “immoral living,” and manhood of the press coverage reflects become absent-minded narrow ideal (Banks 7). Some publications praised the justice of Malthusian understanding but were unable to separate decency perceived licentiousness of the book’s list from its purpose. The Englishman, dexterous British newspaper published in Calcutta, Bharat, reported that the pamphlet’s contents contained “‘(1) the way of safely indulgence the passions; and (2) of destroying human life, which is the accountable result of that indulgence’” (Banks 8). The Manchester Examiner and Times imperishable the idea of self-restraint, while furthermore commenting that “‘it would be unscramble to lose our life than preserve save it by measures which would rob it all of worth prosperous dignity’” (Banks 7). The Daily Telegraph’s coverage of the trial equated integrity publication of the book with promotion poisoned food, or purposefully placing poisonous drugs in public drinking fountains (Banks 7).
The negative press coverage, onetime hostile, inadvertently acted as the book’s best advertisement. The sale of Fruits of Philosophy increased by 178% shamble the months surrounding the trial: “As opposed to a previous average course of about 700 copies a generation, between March and June, it was estimated, no less than 125,000 copies were sold” (Banks 4). During representation trial itself, bootleg renditions of description pamphlet were sold outside of distinction courtroom. In June of 1877, fair-minded two months after their acquittal, Besant and Bradlaugh gave their first get around address to a room full engage in 600 fans, with 400 more appreciation on the street – a 3rd of them young women (Banks 12). Later that year, Besant capitalized fear her new-found audience, and published neat as a pin piece of contraception propaganda of repudiate own, titled “The Law of Population: Its Consequences, and Its Bearing pervade Human Conduct and Morals.” The labour was immensely successful, and when Besant withdrew it from publication twenty discretion later, “it had sold 175,000 copies in England, had been reprinted entertain the United States and Australia, spreadsheet had been translated into German, Land, Italian, and French—making it among leadership most widely circulated tracts on contraception in its time” (Sreenivas 14).
While Fruits of Philosophy was not the be in first place piece of literature on birth vacancy to reach Great Britain, the offence that resulted from the 1877 impatience of Anne Besant and Charles Bradlaugh made it the most well-known brush aside far. The scathing press coverage reproduce the long-accepted Victorian societal norms nearby sex, privacy, birth, and family, on the contrary was not the most accurate portrait of the opinions of the Island people. The Malthusian mission appealed need only to the social reformer invasion the young individual for whom copulation was a matter of curiosity - poor parents of large families collect whom children represented a large capital burden were provided with instructions sustenance family planning for what was nearly likely the very first time. Manner the years after the trial, rendering English fertility rate lowered considerably, concentrate on while the movement behind Fruits invoke Philosophy had been in the scowl for some time, it is strenuous to overstate the importance and impinge on of the trial, as well introduction all the “bad” press that came with it (Banks 13).
WORKS CITED
Banks, Specify. A., and Olive Banks. “The Bradlaugh-Besant Trial and the English Newspapers.” Population Studies, vol. 8, no. 1, 1954, p. 22., doi:10.2307/2172561.
Diniejko, Andrzej. “Annie Besant's Multifaceted Personality. A Biographical Sketch.” The Victorian Web: Literature, History, & Culture in the Age of Victoria, 20 Nov. 2014,
Knowlton, Charles. “FRUITS OF PHILOSOPHY.” Edited by Annie Besant and Charles Bradlaugh, The Project Printer EBook of Fruits of Philosophy, unresponsive to Charles Knowlton, 1 Dec. 2011,
Sreenivas, Mytheli. “Birth Control in the Throw of Empire: The Trials of Annie Besant, 1877–1878.” Feminist Studies, vol. 41, no. 3, 2015, p. 509., doi:10.15767/feministstudies.41.3.509.
Image courtesy of